The Rhizomatic Curriculum Vitae #rhizo15

The Rhizomatic CV

I am still thinking about the first week of #rhizo15some 2500 tweets, lots of FB conversations, lots of playfulness, lots of deep teeter-tottery thinking…. The rhizomatic model, even understood merely as an alternative to what Deleuze and Guattari refer to as the arborescent model of how systems work, is really useful as a way to approach alternatives in education, particularly in my field of interest (adults with intellectual disabilities) and leadership. It makes of us nomads, able to chart our own course despite the “war machine.”

Part of what I am thinking through is ways to link it to social constructionist theory, which is the foundational basis of the Taos Institute, where I am studying.

I am particularly compelled by how the relational aspect of the Taos Institute theorizing might be seen to weave through the conceptualisation of rhizomatic approaches. In Relational Being, Kenneth Gergen writes:

My hope is to demonstrate that virtually all intelligible action is born, sustained, and/or extinguished within the ongoing process of relationship. From this standpoint there is no isolated self or fully private experience. Rather, we exist in a world of co-constitution. We are always already emerging from relationship; we cannot step out of relationship; even in our most private moments we are never alone.

In relation to:

The plane of consistency of Nature is like an immense Abstract Machine, abstract yet real and individual; its pieces are the various assemblages and individuals, each of which groups together an infinity of particles entering into an infinity of more or less interconnected relations. Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 254

I can see in retrospect that this theme runs throughout my life and career, so one of my questions of the last week has been whether we’re learning new ways to work together or are we just tracking the ways we are already working together?  In what ways does the rhizomatic approach differ from existing approaches?  Certainly, it allows a deepening perspective and characterization to the concept of collaboration (not quite the word) in an age privileging individualism and positing a linguistic and pseudo-moral war against dependencies.

After a dizzying experience of the #rhizo14 group, I went into excellent three part coaching course in which we had to draw our life stories, and my realization in doing this was that while I might be able to talk about moving from degree to degree, school to school, job to job, I have moved from relationship to relationship, teacher to teacher, friend to friend.  At every important juncture (which have been mostly educational, for me) the right person appeared to help create a new path.   At about the same time I actually applied for a different job (I’ve happily worked at the same place for nearly 30 years, thus it was remarkable). Combining the two things, I decided to turn my CV into this pictorial trajectory of my career:

CVBlueprint

However, when I looked at this I could see the institutions I attended, and the jobs that I had, but not the people that I met there… and I realized that while I remembered reading and talking about Silas Mariner, and somewhere an essay about it that, when I found it, I couldn’t remember conceiving of or writing (when was I ever that smart and pompous?!), what I really remembered was one late night with the snow falling outside the windows and all the of the students gone, talking to Rob Dunham about the Romantics and the idea of the eternal moment, as experienced by children, impossible to re-conceive of as adults given after we have experienced growing up.  An equally true CV might be a CV of ideas:

CVIdeasI remembered how that conversation led to an exploration of minority literature that was transformational for me, and led me in a different direction…  Or reading Edward Said as research for a Prof I was working with as an assistant, and going down a different path…

I could barely remember studying poetic theory with Rona Murray but I remembered being in a class with her when she was about to hand back marked papers and said this wasn’t what mattered, what mattered was our connections – and for god’s sake don’t kill yourself because you got a C-. I thought she was talking to me. I thought she could read me… and was hopeful for the first time in a while.

Years later, when we had become friends, sitting and watching the ocean, I told her that she might have saved my life and she was shocked. “But I never meant you, I meant this other student in that class!” She was a great, tireless mentor to me, encouraging, always looking for opportunities for me, teaching me about writing, editing my work, helping me connect with other writers, connecting me with people who needed my help, introducing me as someone to watch.  It wasn’t just about sentence structure, but about what one said to make the right impression, and she was wonderfully, gently honest.  I became the person she saw me as, able to introduce myself to homeless people, ambassadors, college deans. But it wasn’t her lessons on poetic theory that stood me in good stead… I channeled her for years and years as I walked into negotiations and charged meetings. I channeled Rob’s ideas about Coleridge, among others, in places where they weren’t expected, where I was able to create disruptions and new expectations.   As well, there were other students in those places who became great friends and I learned from them. One taught me to envision myself with invisible but powerful dreadlocks and all they convey because, he’d say, as gay people we are marching towards freedom but not there yet.

I documented some of those names on my visual CV, but, if I continued even a little more with this idea my CV might look something more like this:

CVNodes

And, given that something like 80% of us find our work through our networks, this kind of a CV might be more “practical” than not.

So, the first CV, an objective one – I studied here, here and there, during these years, and I worked here and here, during these years, represents one part of the story. It perhaps hints, by virtue of looking different from most CVs, of my character and being…   but it is the second and third CV variations that are the more true ones and these are subjective, by which I think I mean relational.

When I realized that everywhere I go to learn I reliably meet the right people and becoming part of a cohort I relaxed in a new way.  As the Fraser and Gordon article on the Geneology of Dependency asks, who profits by us not thinking in these relational ways?

So, what are my learning subjectivities for this #rhizo15 course? I think I will discover those when I find out who my companions will be, as, it seems, in every other area of my life and education. Luke Higgins writes of the rhizomatic model, “What would it mean to begin always from the middle? To experiment with renouncing that lure of mastery with which definitive beginnings and endings seduce thought?”

Higgins, L.B. 2011. “Becoming through multiplicity: Staying in the middle of Whitehead’s and Deleuze-Guattari’s philosophies of life.” In Secrets of becoming: Negotiating Whitehead, Deleuze, and Butler, ed. R. Faber and A.M. Stephenson, 142–54. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, quoted in Kelly Clark/Keefe (2014) “Becoming artist, becoming educated, becoming undone: toward a nomadic perspective of college student identity development,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27:1, 110-134

Advertisements
Tagged , , , ,

8 thoughts on “The Rhizomatic Curriculum Vitae #rhizo15

  1. I’ve been looking at Whitehead in relation to Deleuze …

  2. kerr63 says:

    In the end, you documented your Personal Learning Network…? Less about chronological achievements and more about the rich relationships built over time.

    • Aaron says:

      hmmm my PLN is a pretty intentionally formed group of people with some shared and some different goals, doing educationally directed activities; rather, this documents people that happened to be in places where i went and learning / transformation came out of those relationships… thus i think it is more about rhizomatic learning in that unexpected things happened. “Packs, bands, are groups of the rhizome type, as opposed to the arborescent type that centers around organs of power” (D & G, the War Machine).

  3. Maha Bali says:

    So so so inspired by this, Aaron and also realizing how alternative thinking and learning needs altermative representation to help us reflect on them

  4. […] someone if you think something will interest them. For example, yesterday I saw this awesome rhizome CV by Aaron Johannes, and I didn’t just post it to the general #rhizo15 hashtag, I also tweeted it directly to a […]

  5. very thought-inspiring.. I instantly want to sit back and think about all the people who I have met – who made a contribution to my thought all these years – and many of whom I did not keep in touch with, because of the Introvert I am.. But, I was thinking rhizomatic learning as the unplanned learning from my PLN, ( and from my unplanned learning from going in search of something, and letting myself distracted, but learning something else.. ).. You seem to mention, that learning from your PLN is not so much rhizomatic.. I am not sure if I should agree with that.. I hope, if I learn only one thing from #rhizo15, I would like it to be what rhizomatic learning is.

    • Aaron says:

      Thanks Aparna. I like this description of PLNs/CoPs http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/pln-or-cop.html and because of it I became particularly interested in PLNs and over the last year or so have gathered groups to do various learning activities – a couple of online courses, webinars, and a week in which three of us wrote learning objectives individually and checked in with each other every evening about what we’d learned. This seems to me different than meeting my best friend, from whom I have learned so much, in a rather horrible class which we both walked out of the second day and then became great friends and learned about art, parenting, travelling etc. together. In this posting I was interested in the idea that I might have chosen the room or the activity, but who would be in the room and what we would learn together would be a surprise. As I’ve been looking through papers about rhizomatic analysis it seems to me this spirit of surprise / emancipation that has partly do with companions met along the way is one of the key factors. It could happen within a PLN but wouldn’t need to. There is also a kind of emancipatory response to capitalism inherent in the rhizomatic literature and part of what I perhaps could have been more clear about is that many of these companions helped me move from one class to another…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: